Radiopharma Roundtable — Session 1 Recap | The Bracken Group
Radiopharma Roundtable · Session 1 Recap

The fix for complexity pain points is imaging

Session 1 of Bracken's Radiopharma Roundtable brought clinical, academic, and early-development leaders together to ask a hard question: are radiopharmaceutical trials becoming too complex to succeed? The consensus, and the way forward, are worth an hour of your time. Recorded June 11, 2026.

2 40
Endpoints per trial. Radiopharma trials began with two. Today some carry 15, 20, even 40.
5–10 YRS
Phase 3 timelines. Radiopharma runs 5–10 years, against 2–3 for comparable non-radiopharma work.
3–4
Make-or-break questions that imaging can answer early, before the cost of an extended Phase 1.
Join us for the next session Wednesday, September 16, 2026  ·  11:00 AM ET
Register for Session 2

What Session 1 surfaced

4 takeaways
01

Complexity has quietly become a risk

Endpoints have multiplied, procedures have piled up, and timelines have stretched. More endpoints mean more monitoring, more compliance failures, and a greater likelihood of trial delay, and eventually trial failure — not because the molecule fails, but because the data can't be acquired in time.

02

Let imaging lead the program

Imaging is the field's structural advantage. Because you can image, you can answer the early questions directly: does the tracer bind, is the tumor-to-kidney ratio favorable, what does dosimetry show. You can even fail a bad drug in Phase 1, which is rare in oncology and enormously valuable.

03

Don't bolt radiopharma onto an oncology protocol

It's chalk and cheese: different radiation-safety demands, a fragile supply chain, and a different patient flow. The panel noted approved agents that stumbled precisely because they were forced into a conventional chemotherapy cycle. Fit-for-purpose beats retrofit.

04

Keep the patient at the center

Patient burden, cumulative dose to staff and family, and a scarce specialist workforce are design constraints, not footnotes. Discipline, fewer endpoints, and patient-centric design are how the field protects both sites and outcomes.

Voices from the table

In their own words
"This complexity must be actively managed to avoid running into the risks that we have seen time and time again."
Sandy McEwan, MB, MSc, FRCPC
Profile ↗
"There is a human with cancer at the end of the needle. So, be mindful."
Ovid Trifan, MD, PhD
Profile ↗
"We're very fortunate that we're dealing with biology and chemistry, but we also have physics on our side."
Ben Larimer, PhD
LinkedIn ↗
"It really is a key to us all to look for simpler, fit-for-purpose trial design, to really ensure that we enable success in this very rapidly evolving field."
Colin G. Miller, PhD, FIPEM, CSCI
Profile ↗
Next session

Session 1 named the problem. Session 2 is about the fixes.

We're picking up where the data left off: practical solutions for early-stage radiopharmaceutical development. Plus the questions we deliberately parked, including progression-free survival as a primary endpoint in RLT, and how to read RECIST when uptake within a single lesion is non-homogeneous. New panel, same candid format. Seats are open.

Wednesday, September 16, 2026  ·  11:00 AM ET