Radiopharma Roundtable — Session 2 Recap | The Bracken Group
Radiopharma Roundtable · Session 2 Recap

The half-life is easy. The to-do list is the hard part.

Session 2 of Bracken's Radiopharma Roundtable paired a teaching talk from Ben Larimer with an open panel: Anna Pokorska-Bocci and Deepak Behera working through the strategic calls that decide whether an early radiopharmaceutical program succeeds, long before the isotope's clock starts ticking. Recorded September 16, 2026.

Session 2 panelists
Colin G. Miller, PhD Ben Larimer, PhD Anna Pokorska-Bocci, PhD Deepak Behera, MD
4
Strategic questions, in a deliberate order. Most teams start with therapeutic vs. theranostic — the panel starts with why a diagnostic at all.
$2.6B / 5%
The cost of a late failure, and oncology's odds of success. Ben Larimer's case for using imaging to move failure earlier and cheaper.
1
CRO, ideally. Split vendors across imaging, dosimetry, and clinical ops are, per the panel, one of the field's biggest operational drags.
Join us for the next session Thursday, November 19, 2026  ·  Details to follow
Register for Session 3

What Session 2 surfaced

4 takeaways
01

Start with the diagnostic, not the therapeutic

Most teams open with therapeutic vs. theranostic. Ben Larimer argues that's the wrong end. Because the FDA treats many imaging agents differently than therapeutics, a good targeting molecule can reach a Phase 0 or Phase 1 imaging study with minimal investment — and answer whether the drug hits its target before a single therapeutic dose is given.

02

Design for dosimetry, don't audit it afterward

Dose isn't one number. It's four dials: activity, mass, schedule, and cycles. The mistake, per Deepak Behera, is treating dosimetry as a post-hoc analysis instead of a design input. Use imaging to design for dosimetry up front, and the odds improve exactly where failure gets expensive — Phase 2 and Phase 3.

03

Pick the isotope from the biology, not the shelf

The classic mistake is defaulting to DOTA because it's familiar and royalty-free. The panel's case: match the imaging isotope to the therapeutic isotope's chemistry first, even if that means moving past a familiar chelator to a better-matched pair. The isotope choice also decides your supply chain — centralized manufacturing versus site-by-site.

04

The bottleneck is fragmentation, not chemistry

Sites need more than equipment: radiochemistry, scanner time, and dosimetry expertise, all producing repeatable measurements. Vendors split the same way — physical supply versus CRO and data management. Anna Pokorska-Bocci's fix: one CRO, one point of contact, spanning imaging, dosimetry, and clinical operations.

Voices from the table

In their own words
"The half-life is the easy part. It's fixed physics. The hard part is everything you have to do before the half-life clock even starts ticking."
Ben Larimer, PhD
LinkedIn ↗
"It's not simply how many sites are open, but how reliably can we treat patients safely and obtain the complete data that we need for the next decision."
Deepak Behera, MD
"It's an important thing to discuss before you see the images, because then a decision has to be made."
Anna Pokorska-Bocci, PhD
Next session

Session 2 named the fixes. Session 3 keeps building the playbook.

Larimer, Pokorska-Bocci, and Behera walked through the strategic calls that decide an early radiopharmaceutical program: why a diagnostic, which isotope, what supply chain, and how to design for dosimetry before you need it. New panel, same candid format. Seats are open.

Thursday, November 19, 2026  ·  Details to follow